Bentham on Intention and Motive:
- Bentham explored the effect of moral character depending on the presence or absence of different cognitive and affective elements.
- His approach reflects Aquinas' but he differs in terminology and moral evaluation.
- Aquinas believed that an act is intentional if it chosen as a means to an end. If an action is an unavoidable consequence or accompaniment to such a choice it was not intentional but only voluntary.
- Bentham argued that 'voluntary' was the wrong word for Aquinas to use and he should have used 'intentional'.
- Bentham believed in the same distinctions as Aquinas, but said that they were distinctions of intention.
- A consequence is either directionally intentional or obliquely intentional.
- A directly intentional action is either ultimately or immediately intentional depending on whether the action was a motive or not.
- Bentham wanted to define intention in cognitive terms
- He believed that intention is a key criteria for moral and legal evaluations of actions.
- Intentions are not good or bad in themselves, the consequences make them good or bad.
- Consequences are dependent on circumstances, and circumstances are either known or unknown by the agent.
- If the circumstances are known by the agent an act is an advised act. An unadvised act is when the circumstances are not known by the agent.
- Both humans and animals have a sense of understanding and sensation.
- Only humans have the ability to reason and a capacity for reflection which allows us to have language, freedom and science.
- Abstract knowledge can be retained and shared.
- Both humans and animals have wills but only humans can deliberate.
- Ethics is based on morals but morals are abstract
- Will is present and active in the universe.
- All will rises from a want, which implies a deficiency in something and therefore all will comes from suffering
- The definition of a genius is someone who is 'imaginative and restless...dislikes mathematic and lives on the borderline of madness.'
- Rejects the idea of the dualism of mind and body
- 'The body is nothing more than the objectification of the will and its desires.'
- The science of the mind was introduced in the 19th century though empirical and experimental methods.
- Professor of psychology, Wilhelm Wundt introduced the science of the mind in 1879 in Leipzig.
- In 1878 William James set up a psychology lab in Harvard University - the first doctorate was awarded.
- Wrote Principles of Psychology in 1980 - a summary of new findings in psychology.
- Theory of emotions - proposed emotions are perceptions of bodily processes; all states of consciousness can be called 'feelings'.
- Some feelings are cognitive and some are not.
- For a feeling to be cognitive there must be in the world another entity resembling the feeling in its quality and the feeling must be directly or indirectly operate upon this entity.
- Consciousness is essentially a private, internal phenomenon, capable of existing in isolation from any body.
- In his book Introductory Lecture of Psychoanalysis, Freud stated that the greater part of our mental life is unconscious.
- Only a fraction of what we know and believe is present to consciousness in the sense of being an object of our immediate attention.
- Freud believed that there are three sets of phenomena that reveal the existence of the unconscious:
- Trivial everyday mistakes: Freud suggests that these mistakes are not accidental, they reveal the hidden motives of the unconscious
- Reports of dreams: Freud called dreams 'the royal road to a knowledge of the unconscious activities of the mind' but we cannot interpret our own dreams, we need a psychoanalyst. He believed that dreams are our repressed wishes and are coded, but when stripped down they are usually sexual. Dream codes are unique to each dreamer, they cannot be universalised.
- Neurotic symptoms: The interpretation of neuroses by a psychoanalyst is dependant on the patient accepting the interpretations, but often patients do not accept this.
- Freud explained that mental harmony is dependant on the conflict between the ID, Ego and Superego.
- Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was written by Ludwig Wittgenstein.
- Wittgenstein tried to explain the model of the mind.
- He accepted that psychology is genuine empirical science and thought that philosophy of the mind was on a par with psychology.
- In Tractatus he states that a thought is a logical picture of facts.
- Wittgenstein identified thoughts with propositions which could be either a sign/sentence or a thought. A sign or sentence is a relation between spoken words. A though is a relation between physical elements.
- Thinking a thought involved a psychic element in the sense of mental images or internal impressions.
- Meaning is conferred on signs by us and our conventions - these are not facts of science.
- Brentano reintroduced intentionality into philosophy in the 19th century.
- In his book Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (1874) Brentano wanted to marl off physical from physical phenomena.
- He claimed that there are two kinds of action:
- Transient: Actions that change their object
- Immanent: Actions that change the agent not the object
- Brentano's distinction between physical and physical phenomena corresponds to the distinction between immanent and transient actions.
- Husserl took this over from Brentano.
- Husserl tells us that consciousness consists of 'intentional experiences or acts'.
- Every mental acts is a certain kind belonging to a certain species.
- He called individual acts the noesis and the specific content the noema.
- Acts have matter and qualities - so do imaginations, perception, emotion and volition. For example, seeing Rome and imagining Rome have the same content (Rome) but different qualities (imagining and seeing).
- Wittengstein's later philosophy was a direct reaction to Bertrand Russell, who ignored intentionality.
- Wittgenstein believed that intentionality was all important in understanding and language.
- He thought that the human mind is not a spirit and that there is not such thing as the self.
- Thought and understanding are not processes - there are different criteria of 'thought' and 'understanding'
- He demolished the concept that the connection between consciousness and expression is merely contingent - if this was true then theoretically everything in the universe could be conscious.
- The only evidence that humans are conscious is that we all consciousness in ourselves.
- Experiences one can have is dependent on how one can behave.
- It is wrong to identify the mind with behaviour - it is even more wrong to identify the mind with the brain.
- Connection between mind and brain is contingent, discoverable by empirical science.
No comments:
Post a Comment